Capella 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources NURS-FPX 4030 Making Evidence-Based Decisions ​​​​​​​Diabetes Mellitus and Evidence-based Practice

Capella 4030 Assessment 2

Diabetes is a leading cause of mortality in populations worldwide. It is approximated that 451 million people had been diagnosed with diabetes in the year 2017 and the number is expected to rise to 693 million by 2045. Additionally, it is predicted that diabetic patients are more likely to end up with several chronic and metabolic conditions like cardiovascular problems and kidney problems (Shi et al., 2022). A study based on the identification of mortality rate due to diabetes in 20-79-year-old adults showed that around 4.2 million deaths in this age group are contributed by diabetes mellitus. An estimated 11.3% of deaths occurred globally where only 6.8% is in Africa whereas the Middle East and North Africa had the highest rate of 16.2%. (Saeedi et al., 2020). 

The growing prevalence of diabetes and the leading risk of mortality advocates the need for evidence-based practice in the treatment and management of chronic conditions. The purpose of evidence-based practices is to ensure that consumers are provided with effective care using successful strategies to minimize the global burden, enhance patient outcomes, and improve the quality of care (Abu-Baker et al., 2021). 

Criteria to Analyze the Credibility of the Resources

Evidence-based practices are based on evidence-based research, which is the reason it is essential to sort the credible and relevant resources from the pool of information available online. One of the criteria established for the identification of the credibility of the resources is the CRAAP test, which is an acronym for currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose (Lowe et al., 2021). This five-letter test is used to analyze if the resource is up-to-date with the time, if it is relevant in terms of the topic being researched, if is it authorized by credible writers and journals, whether the claims are well-supported with scholarly evidence, and if the purpose of the study is significant and clear for the audience. 

Let us take the example of the resource below to better understand the CRAAP criteria. The article by Shi and colleagues (2022) titled “The Prevalence of Diabetes, Prediabetes, and Associated Risk Factors in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province: A community-based cross-sectional study”, published in the journal Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy fulfill the CRAAP criteria by: 

Capella 4030 Assessment 2

1. Currency – the publication age of this article is within 5 years, which gives a strong point that the article is based on current trends and practices. 
2. Relevance – the title and the content of the article is relevant to the topic of research which is diabetes mellitus. 
3. Authority – authors are well-versed in their knowledge about the topic as they belong to the field and work in healthcare organizations. Moreover, the publishing journal is credible and relevant to the health condition as well. 
4. Accuracy – the article is well-supported by scholarly data as evidenced by the citations and references provided by the authors. 
5. Purpose – the purpose of the study is clear and meaningful for the audience and the healthcare professionals. 

Credibility and Relevance of Evidence and Resources

The scholarly evidence used in this paper for diabetes mellitus is reliable and credible for healthcare professionals to learn and gain knowledge for improving their practices by the integration of evidence-based practice. For example: 

The article authorized by Punthakee and fellows (2018) which provides information about diabetes, prediabetes, and metabolic syndrome is credible as it covers the CRAAP criteria and its relevance to the topic. This article presents the ranges of blood glucose levels to classify different types of diabetes and prediabetes. The information presented is helpful for nurses and other healthcare professionals to include the knowledge in their care and management of these patients (Punthakee et al., 2018). 

Another study by Saeedi and colleagues (2020) is credible and relevant because it fulfills CRAAP criteria. Moreover, this article is based on a study to estimate the rate of mortality in a group of populations related to diabetes. It is relevant for healthcare professionals to understand the risk of diabetes, identify the high-risk population, and improve their outcomes using evidence-based practices (Saeedi et al., 2020).

Capella 4030 Assessment 2

There are several resources available online that are credible and relevant to the topic of diabetes mellitus. These resources help in understanding the disease succinctly and applying evidence-based strategies to care